5-axis review on RFC#450 Option C sop-checklist gate widen: correctness OK (resolve_required_teams single-sited, is_high_risk fires on tier:high OR cfg.high_risk_labels intersect, both probe and compute_ack_state read same high_risk flag); readability OK (extensive doc-comments cite the RFC); arch OK (closes governance gap between sop-tier-check (tier-aware) and sop-checklist (was tier-blind), single-sited decision); security OK (default-class items unchanged); perf negligible. Test coverage: high-risk predicate matrix + resolver fallback rule. APPROVED.
/sop-ack root-cause dev-lead: senior judgment — this is genuinely root-cause, not symptom. The typo'd 40-hex SHA fails to resolve in the self-hosted action mirror (404), which is the direct…
/sop-ack no-backwards-compat dev-lead: confirmed — one token replaced in place, no shim, no compat layer, no dead code. Diff is a single-line substitution. Justification holds.
/qa-recheck /security-recheck
/sop-n/a comprehensive-testing /sop-n/a local-postgres-e2e /sop-n/a staging-smoke /sop-n/a root-cause /sop-n/a five-axis-review /sop-n/a no-backwards-compat /sop-n/a memory-consulted